Jim Dickie and Barry Trailer of CSO INSIGHTS do a great job
every year of taking the pulse of sales leaders and sharing their survey
results and opinions. The 2011 Sales Compensation and Performance
Management – Key Trends survey is another good read from Jim and Barry, and
as we have come to expect, their insights and observations add a lot of value
to the raw results.
A copy of the
survey results is available at http://bit.ly/pbvNHG
As I was preparing for a conference presentation next month,
I was re-reading the results and I was struck by one chart in particular. When the question was asked – What aspects of your comp plan would you
change, and in what order?
The top
three results were
- Management’s ability to judge plan effectiveness
- Management's visibility into sales performance
- Ability to model plan revisions
The bottom three, in terms of priorities were
- Managing credits, exceptions and adjustments
- Minimize inquiries and disputes
- Support compliance requirements
The complete list is good, and I am sure that anybody
reviewing it could not disagree with it as a whole. This list however, represents the perspective
of sales leaders as it relates to compensation.
I wonder, if we asked CFOs, Compensation Teams, and HR leaders how they
feel, would we get the same list and the same priorities. My hunch is that while other groups wouldn’t
disagree with any of the requested changes, they believe that the fast and
accurate payment of commissions, and minimizing inquiries and disputes will
increase sales job satisfaction and give the sales team more time to sell by reducing their administrative effort
and shadow accounting efforts. This could
be argued as one of the biggest benefits of automating the commissions
management process and therefore made the top priority for the compensation
team.
I have often talked about the need for cross-functional organization
alignment, around goals and priorities when implementing a Sales Performance
Management System. If the
cross-functional team isn’t aligned as to what the short and long term goals
and objectives are, then the projects are in risk of cost and time overruns and
missing expectations of some group when it is delivered. What
this chart got me thinking is that it’s not enough to make sure that the list
of goals is correct, but also that they are prioritized and agreed upon by the whole team. Getting alignment from the start will save everyone a lot of time and effort in the long run.
2 comments:
Brian,
Thanks for the shout out and kind remarks. You make an important point. With all the talk about sales & marketing alignment, we are amazed each year to see the huge percentage (58%)of firms that do not have a formally agreed upon definition of a qualified lead.
As you point out, there are likely similarly disconected priorities and objectives between sales & finance/hr around sales comp. Your suggestion of aligning these up front makes good sense!
Barry Trailer
Managing Partner
CSO Insights
Great insights, Brian. Couldn't agree more. At Xactly, we've seen companies transform revenues simply when they give sales leaders and reps real-time visibility into their sales performance. Sales leaders definitely need to start developing success strategies for 2012. Good advice from Cygnal Group on designing effective sales compensation plans here: http://www.xactlycorp.com/media/2011/10/starting-2012-off-right-redesign-your-compensation-plan/
Post a Comment