Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Sound Plan Design

 

At INSIGHT11 in Boston this week, Brandon Kulik from Deloitte’s Sales Effectiveness/Human Capital Management practice presented his thoughts on integrating administrative and technology functions into the sales compensation plan design process. 

He suggests that the plan design process is multi-functional, highly visible, business impacting, and yet for a lot of organizations it leaves out critical players who can ensure its success.  Two of the most critical and sometimes overlooked players include those who are responsible for administering the plans and those who provide the data and upstream systems which are part of the overall commissions management process.  

All too often sales teams design plans with the best of intentions, but without input from compensation administration and information technology groups.  Without their involvement in the design process it’s hard to determine the practicality, cost and time involved in implementing their ideas. For example, if the data required to calculate commissions for a new plan doesn’t exist then the plan needs to be reconsidered, or the time to implement extended so that the data can be sourced from new or different systems.  It is much better to know this early when there is time to adjust, rather than figure it out after the new plans have been communicated to the sales team.

Another key point of Brandon’s talk was that the compensation administration and information technology groups bring a detailed understanding of the way things work today.   Many new plan concepts are designed and work at a general level, but confusion and mis-interpretation creep in where there are exceptions, unique cases and the like.  There is a need for absolute clarity on how the rules should be interpreted and managed in every scenario.  Making sure everyone understands this, can significantly reduce delays, errors and significant cost and wasted effort further down the road. 

Two other key considerations to ensure a more effective plan design process are to ensure that there is a governance process that formalizes the involvement of the compensation administration and information technology groups to ensure that this involvement is not ad hoc or convenient, but rather part of the standard processes by which the organization operates.  The other was to leverage modern sales performance management solutions to aid in the analysis, implementation, communication, roll-out and eventual success of the new plans.  Relying on legacy systems, manual processes and spreadsheet based systems will not allow organizations to efficiently and effectively design, implement and roll-out new plans at the speed of business today.

If you have any comments or follow–up questions please post them here or contact Brandon directly at bkulik@deloitte.com

Look for more than improved efficiency when implementing a Sales Performance Management System

I am often asked about the drivers of Sales Performance Management projects.  What specifically are organizations looking to accomplish?    How do they determine the Return on Investment (ROI) on their Sales Performance Management initiative?  What are the first priorities?

While every organization is unique and they each have their own challenges, perspectives and priorities there are three categories of benefits that are common across Sales Performance Management projects. 

They are:

·      Efficiency gains

·      Business enablement

·      Reduced risk

One of these goals normally takes precedence over the others and tends to get most of the focus from project teams.  Organizations are well-advised to look at the opportunity for business gains across all three drivers.  

Efficiency Gains

Organizations often start projects with the goal of looking for efficiency gains.  The pains associated with high commission error rates, delays in processing times, and significant effort and administrative burden are tangible and it is relatively easy to quantify the benefit of gaining improvements in this area.

Improved efficiency is about doing more with less.  The expected gains are in area of reducing the time and effort it takes to process and manage commissions, quotas, roster and territories.  Reducing effort to maintain the current systems, reducing the number of days to process month ends, reducing errors rates in commissions are all common themes.  This makes a lot of sense as industry analysts cite that organizations implementing a Sales Performance Management System (SPM) can reduce the administrative and IT staffing effort by more than fifty percent.  They can also expect to reduce incentive compensation calculation errors by over ninety percent.   Organizations looking for a hard ROI can generally find find ample evidence of organizations than have had major successes in processing efficiency.

Business Enablement

The second area of benefit that most organizations find is in enabling the business to do something that was previously too impractical if not impossible to do.  Many organizations are unable to implement certain types of components in their plans as their current systems, processes and technology preclude them from doing what they want.  Common examples include implementing margin-based versus revenue-based plans, introducing quarterly SPIFs, and incentives to drive certain packages or bundled offerings.   Being able to adjust to market shifts and implement changes quickly can help organizations take advantage of new market opportunities and react to other market shfts quickly.  The overall result is that incentive compensation plans drive the desired sales behavior and help with organizational alignment.   The inability to do this has long been the frustration of many sales leaders.   Modern SPM systems provide sales leaders with the speed and flexibility to drive the sales organization the way they want, ultimately driving increased revenue, increased margins, and increased organizational alignment.

 

Risk Reduction

The third driver of interest in Sales Performance Management software is risk reduction.  According to the respected analyst firm Gartner, approximately ninety percent of organizations with over one hundred sales reps are using home-grown or spreadsheet based solutions to manage incentive compensation.   While these 'systems' lead to many of the inefficiencies and create roadblocks to improved effectiveness that I referred to earlier, it is often the case that there is a compliance or audit driver that is behind putting in a new Sales Performance Management software solution. 

From a compliance viewpoint the challenge is to provide a holistic view of commissions from an overall view down to individual performance.  Increased checks and balances, multiple approval levels, tracking down exceptions and other compliance requirements tend to put a burden on home-grown and spreadsheet based systems that slow them down and create more rigidity - exactly the opposite of what is required.     Modern Sales Performance Management solutions provide built-in complete audit trails, plan approvals, dispute resolution and compressive reporting on exactly how and when territories, quotas, plans and commissions were changed.   For many organizations this increased visibility replaces error prone and time consuming email chains and voice mails.  Payees appreciate the clear and consistent view of their commissions, administrators save significant time and effort tracking down reasons for adjustments, and sales compensation administrators are much better prepared for both external and internal audit and compliance requirements.